May 29, 2008

Murphy fires police chief involved in 'Dateline NBC' sex predator sting


Apr 18, 2008

Judge allows IIED claim against NBC to go ahead


Feb 9, 2008

New Civil Lawsuit Against perverted-justice.com


Jan 19, 2008

PJ's Wikisposure - More of the same but worse


Nov 1 , 2007

Judge OKs deposition of 'Dateline' reporter in predator case


Jul 26, 2007

Hundred MIllion Dollar Lawsuit Against Dateline


ul 20, 2007

Xavier Von Erck Shows His True Colors At Cleveland Law Enforcement Expo


Jun 5, 2007

Default Judgement Issued Against Perverted-Justice in Recent New Mexico Lawsuit


May 25, 2007

Dateline NBC TCAP Producer's Wrongful Dismissal Lawsuit Reveals Serious PJ Issues


Feb 14, 2007

Perverted-Justice Owner Organizes Harassment of an Innocent Mom


Nov 22, 2006

Perverted-Justice Implements Another CJ Demand


Nov 10, 2006

Again, Perverted-Justice and Dateline Bring Death


July 9, 2006

Xavier Von Erck, "an ethical young man with a vision"


April 29, 2006
Corrupted-Justice.com
Two Years Old and Going Strong

April 9, 2006

Perverted-Justice to be paid more than $100,000.00 for Dateline participation


February 18, 2006

Perverted-Justice Distributes Fliers Containing Innocent Family's Address


February 10, 2006

A few Facts about Perverted-Justice that you did not see on TV


February 3 , 2006

Corrupted-Justice Efforts Rewarded


November 6, 2005

Dateline Program Clearly Proves Ineffectiveness of Perverted-Justice Tactics


October 26, 2005

Is The perverted-justice "Jury" Biased?


October 10, 2005

The truth behind the purpose of the perverted-justice Right of Reply (RoR)


July 6, 2005

What Do Respected Professionals Think About perverted-justice.com?


June 6, 2005

Is Corrupted-Justice.com a "Pro-Pedophile" Organization?


April 29 , 2005

Corrupted-Justice One Year Old!


April 23, 2005

PJ Supporting Hacker Under Arrest And Intictment.


April 23, 2005

Registration No Longer Required For Corrupted-Justice Forums


March 3 , 2005

Is perverted-justice.com Sexually Exploiting Children?


January 23 , 2005

Protocol Change At PJ?


December 31, 2004

Happy New Year!


December 24, 2004

Season's Greetings From The Staff At Corrupted-Justice.com

 

 

 

 
  

October 10, 2005:

The Truth Behind The Purpose Of The perverted-justice "Right of Reply" (RoR)

From the perverted-justice.com FAQ:

Q. How can I get you to take my information down?

A. Give us a damn good reason. As I related above, it is rare. Give us a damn good reason. And it better be damn good. Otherwise, we won't even entertain the thought. Basically if you're ashamed, if you know you did something wrong, I suggest writing a "Right of Reply" to us to be posted. These "Rights of Reply" are given to you for you to address our community and explain yourself.

In case after case of perverted-justice "busts", we become aware of chats which have taken place between PJ harassers and the PJ target after the target has been posted on the site. It begins immediately after the target is posted - Anonymous PJ vigilantes put the PJ machine in motion by immediately IMing (Instant Messaging) the posted bust with insults, threats, intimidation and coercion.

It quickly becomes obvious in the vast majority of these "after-bust" chats that the primary motivation for the PJ member contacting the target in the first place is the sick thrill they get from their ability to anonymously wield power over another person. In the cases where the target hasn't yet fully realized the danger involved in communicating with the vigilantes and actually attempts to have a rational discussion, there is almost always a common demand made repeatedly by the PJ members during the intimidation session: "The only chance you have to get your information removed from PJ is by sending an RoR to the site owner".

The RoR is primarily used as a method whereby the vigilantes at perverted-justice can receive verification that their harassment techniques have achieved their intended purpose - To terrorize someone into performing a public display of submission, thereby validating the harasser's personal psychological need for dominance.

The truth is, we are aware of only one case out of well over 1000 where the target's information was supposedly removed as a result of his RoR. (And even in that case, there have been some serious unanswered questions pertaining to some additional "influences" which may have been used to have the information removed.) In all the cases we've reviewed to date, we have yet to find a single RoR that was not completely and totally written as a result of intimidation, coercion and threats from PJ members. Consider the circumstances under which the RoR is written - death threats, continuous phone calls, constant IMs, e-mails, and the suggestion that all this will go away if only they write an RoR. Hardly an atmosphere that would be conducive to an expression of honesty and true regret.

Along with our advice to PJ targets to immediately seek legal advice, we always attempt to ensure they are aware of the facts surrounding the sending of a "Right of Reply" letter to Phillip Eide, the owner of PJ. Contrary to the continuous assertions by PJ staff that submitting an RoR will "help" the target and will likely result in the removal of his information from the site, the truth is, in the majority of cases, the RoR actually makes matters worse! In our experience, once posted on PJ, the RoR itself is used primarily as a catalyst for further harassment.

The RoR is seen in one of only two possible lights by PJ members: It is interpreted as either an admission of guilt or clear evidence of the target's attempt to avoid responsibility for his actions. In either case, the RoR is posted publicly, then the "believability" of the RoR is voted on and discussed by PJ members and the incitement of further harassment of the target, his family, friends, neighbors, etc. is planned and executed via the "Reactions" forum at the site.

To get a true picture of the real purpose of the RoR, one has only to read the posts in the perverted-justice "Reactions" forum each time a new RoR is posted.

First: A post from a new PJ member who quickly recognized the futility of a "bust" writing an RoR. The PJ member posted his thoughts and was subsequently banned from PJ.

PJ Member: mikimouse

"I think some people here like the RoR just so they can insult and make fun of the pervs. I think it would discourage the perv's from ever doing the RoR. If the busted perv reads these comments they may think this site nothing more than entertainment for the viewers here and they may refuse to take this situation seriously. We know pedophelia's a social problem, much as drugs are or booze or the like. If someone is truly out to save souls from the evil drugs they would never ever call the drug abusers 'stupid junkies' or 'fucking assholes' or things like that. It wouldn't be condusive at all. I know what these pedo's do is wrong and evil and scummy etc...But if I wanted to truly help anyone I wouldn't be insulting them all the time calling them disparaging names. I have no sympathy for these sick pedophiles. None at all. I'd love to shoot them in the face with no remorse. What bugs me is how some people here will contact the busted perv through the IM thing saying "send a RoR and give your side of it....you want everyone to know you're a sick fuck who tries to fuck little girls?...Don't make it harder on yourself.....send a RoR and maybe just maybe you'll be taken off the site"....Then when the RoR comes in they laugh and insult and take it as entertainment."

Another response from another PJ member in the same thread. This user was also banned from perverted-justice for voicing his opinion:

PJ Member: JohnSheridan

"I have yet to see one ROR that has ever stopped the FUF from "following up" - so why do busts continue to bother with them? All it does is subject them to more ridicule."

Why do these people get this impression? Why do they feel that the RoR is being used in this manner?

To assist you in seeing the truth, we've compiled a small random sampling of the typical results of the posting of an RoR on perverted-justice.com. Remember - These responses are copied directly from perverted-justice and were written by both the hard-core fanatics and general members in response to the posting of various bust's Right of Reply letters. They are not responses to the chat or whatever else the target may have done. They are direct responses to the Right of Reply letters sent by the targets.


Senior PJer simkidone:

"In this ROR I see no remorse whatsoever for what he did. These wannabe's want us to be understanding and forgiving..... YOU ARE GROWN MEN YOU PATHETIC FUCKS! You show absolutely no compassion or understanding at all to these young people you talk dirty to or attempt to meet to play out your filthy fantasies with. Why should we show you anything more than contempt and disgust. This ROR is USELESS!!!"

Senior PJer Emmets:

"o.k. let's disect this piece of shit ROR. (1) He is so happy to say, "Hello everyone here on pervertedjustice.com" (2) He says, "I can't and don't expect anyone to really honestly believe me but i seriously have no interest in little children." This piece of shit thinks this is a game and he is the game show host! What a waste of human flesh this low life is! And NO, ass F--k no believes you!"

PJ Member Mozkatt:

"It was a "mistake", and he will "look into" counselling? Not good enough. When they use the word 'mistake', that's when I get really pissed.
He got caught, and that's the only reason he's sorry. Asshole."

PJ Member WikdEvilGoddess:

"Mistake asswipe? Hardly. You knowingly did what you did and you almost try to make it acceptable by condoning your own filthy self gratuitous actions. You knew what you did was wrong,hence it was not a mistakes. Mistakes are accidents fucknuts, this by no means was any flippin' accident. End of story."

PJ Member MelodyOhMy:

"I was enraged by this lame ass pathetic excuse for a ROR! Yeah he believes he is the only one hurt by it because fortunately it was not really a young girl on the other end of the computer monitor....but what if it had been fucktard?! Then would you have been the only one hurt by it. Jesus this pedo makes me sick to my stomach and I thank God every day for perverted-justice!!!!"

PJ Member Mozkatt:

"One of the worst, because he committed what I feel is one of the major 'don'ts' of a ROR-DON"T ask for your info to come down, dumbass!"

Senior PJer Bonnie Parker:

"Insincere bastard. Want your own child? I hope that never happens. Sterilization would be a good measure for this guy"

PJ Member Sherlocka:

"I'll sterilize him with my sh*t-kicker boots. C'mere, moron!

COMPLETELY & UTTERLY INSINCERE. He's just worried about himself. "

Senior PJer KashmirGoat:

"ugh...

1) Grammar.

2) The god card. "Swearing to god on the bible", is that a double negative?

3) What Pibb said. He's a moron, too.

I can only hope that his pathological personality will keep him from ever contributing to the gene pool."

PJ Member Mermainynn:

"He doesn't give a shit. Hey Ron get your perv helmet on, you're in for a rough ride!"

PJ Member ManicMonday:

"Oh man, this guy is just jerking us off. He's throwing God out there to make us stop. We want "real" documented proof of counseling!"

PJ Member War:

"it would be just so much easier if they killed themselves due to the shame..."

"I think I will start a new thread in the off topic section to post ideas for ways pervs can committ suicide..."

Senior PJer JessicaRabbit:

"War, I SO agree. In fact I have dreamed up about 99 creative ways for them to do it if they ever want any pointers!"

And finally, a full RoR and Senior PJer JessicaRabbit's response to each line: (The original RoR is in blue, the PJer's response to each line in black)

The writ of my response is as follows.
Well really, it's just my pathetic attempt to get you off my back.

My apologies are sincerely sent out to anyone (if any) that were offended or disgusted by the set up bestowed upon me

.I know it wasn't a set up, I'm just trying to place the blame for my own actions anywhere but on myself.

I have never molested, harmed nor harrassed any children, or adults for that matter.

I'm lying here, just grasping for straws. Will this make it any better?

Anything said was strictly conversational fantasy, and it remains as such as persuing any such profanity would be out of my abilities.

You see, I wanted to solicit a child for sex, it really is that simple. You sure bet I would curse if it made me appear more appealing to an emotionally unavailable child.

I do not wish any such ill-will upon anyone and I personally salute those that put forth their time to elminate it.

I'm just sitting here thinking, damn I got caught, my jig is up.

Role-playing is a very common game amongst the internet generation and playing such characters is very common for all ages. I do not use role-playing as an excuse for the conversation, however, as a comparison to how popular derogative conversation is on the web.

How much more bullshit could I spin to try and make you all believe it? Will it work?

As a member of many community clubs and non-profit centers, I cherish life and despise those that commit such bodily or even mental harm upon others.

Just how in the world did I get caught disrespecting the rights of a child? Oh yeah, that's right I just don't give a damn. I'm pissed I got caught.

Do these examples make it alright to perform the conversation, of course not. I did reply several times if any of the conversation was offensive to the other and every response was replyed with a no.

I knew a lonely child would say no, so I went for the kill. Easy prey.

Whomever was impersonating a thirteen year old girl (which was conversed as a 14 year old, though this makes no difference), was definately acting out the part to the point of encourage meeting.

And I did as any wannabe baby raper would, I convinced the child into it myself, and just to remove any guilt from myself I lied right here saying the child did it. Always easy to put the blame anywhere but on myself.

As a friend that I thought I developed, of course friends talk about meeting at some point in time. This would be completely unrealistic and quite possibly impossible.

Quite possibly impossible, hell. I wanted to abuse a lonely child and I knew it. I know as an adult I should have no contact for friendship, with anyone under 18. I just wanted to abuse a child, and now I wanna make more excuses for myself. Is this working yet?

Even if meeting was capable of happening, I would morally rescind from doing so.

Simply because I don't wanna get caught.

I do admit, I do have a sexual nature about me that concerns others and for that, I am and will continue to presue counseling - at which I will send proof as a follow up.

I'm lying here too, just making a pathetic attempt at making myself look better.

Again, I send my apologies out to those who have been offended by this.

Again, I'm just so sorry I got caught trying to engage a child in conversation for my own illicit purposes.

Sincerely,

Well not really,

xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx

AKA wannabe baby raper.

Above is my interpretation of this lifeless & worthless RoR.

 


Again, this is just a small random sample of the "reactions" to the Right of Reply letters demanded by PJ members during their harassment sessions with their targets. In virtually every case, the reaction, and the resulting increase in harassment is the same.

To those with the capability for rational thought, the purpose of the Right of Reply letter is blatantly obvious: The RoR is primarily used as a method whereby the vigilantes at perverted-justice can receive verification that their harassment techniques have achieved their intended purpose - To terrorize someone into performing a public display of submission, thereby validating the PJ member's personal psychological need for dominance.

 
Copyright Corrupted-Justice.com - All Rights Reserved 2004 - 2008